Mastercard 4841 chargeback (cancelled recurring or digital goods): how to respond

What a 4841 dispute claims

Mastercard 4841 covers two situations that look different but share an answer. In the first, the cardholder cancelled a recurring subscription and was billed anyway. In the second, they bought something digital or started a trial and say they didn’t authorize the charge that followed.

Free trials and introductory offers that convert to a paid plan are a common trigger for subscription businesses: the customer remembers the trial, not the conversion, and sees a charge they don’t recognize.

You get one submission on Shopify Payments and Stripe. Gather everything first and submit before the due date shown in the dispute.

How 4841 differs from Visa 13.2

The argument is the same as Visa 13.2. The difference is what tips a close case. Visa 13.2 is purely about recurring billing. Mastercard 4841 also covers digital goods, and for digital products the strongest evidence is often that the customer used what they paid for.

• For a physical subscription: lead with consent and the reminder, then show the renewal shipped and was delivered.
• For software, content or memberships: lead with consent and the reminder, then show login or usage records after the renewal, with dates, IP addresses and devices.
• For a trial that converted: the consent record must show the customer saw that the trial would convert to a paid plan and at what price.

The evidence that wins

The order to argue it in

For a digital or software subscription, this is the order the engine uses:

1. The cardholder agreed to recurring terms at signup (terms version, timestamp, checkbox).
2. A renewal reminder was sent before the disputed charge, with a link to manage or cancel.
3. No cancellation request was received before the renewal date.
4. The cardholder logged in and used the product after the renewal (access log with dates, IPs and devices).
5. Earlier payments from the same customer, device or IP were never disputed.

A response template for a digital subscription

The cardholder [name] signed up for [product] on [date] and accepted recurring billing of [amount] every [interval] (Exhibit A: terms version [x], accepted [timestamp]).

A renewal reminder was sent to [email] on [date], [n] days before the disputed charge, with a link to manage or cancel (Exhibit B).

We received no cancellation request before the charge on [date] (Exhibit C).

After the renewal, the account was used on [dates] from [IP / device] (Exhibit D), the same device and IP used on earlier undisputed payments (Exhibit E).

The charge was authorized under the terms the cardholder accepted and was not preceded by a cancellation.

Mistakes that lose winnable 4841 cases

• Leaving out usage evidence on a digital product. It is the strongest proof you have and the one the bank can’t get elsewhere.
• Showing general terms instead of this customer’s acceptance of them.
• Treating a converted trial like any renewal. The bank will ask whether the customer was told the price and the conversion date, so the consent record has to show it.
• A reminder that arrives after the charge, or none at all.
• Fighting a case where the customer did cancel first. Refund it and fix the cancellation flow.

The same dispute on other card networks

Questions

Related guides